Gasification & Energy from Waste (EfW) Review
§ Independent assessment · ranked on operating record
EfW Review  ›  History

The commercial history of waste gasification.

Gasification is old technology — and most of what people call “new” is a re-run of a lesson the industry has learned before: a reactor works in a pilot long before it works at commercial scale, and the gap between the two has buried a lot of capital.

§ A short timeline

EraWhere the technology stood
1800sTown gas from coal establishes the principle — partial oxidation of carbon to syngas — later applied to waste.
1960s–70sFirst waste-fed thermal processing systems; tire carbonisation and plastic-to-oil processors enter service.
1970s–80sContinuous gasification-melting is developed for mixed industrial and automotive waste; a tire-to-oil processor wins a national technology award in 1983.
1990s–2000sMunicipal-scale gasification-melting matures in Japan — the MHI and Kobelco systems scale to hundreds of tonnes a day and hundreds of plants.
2010sThe plasma boom and bust: Alter NRG / Westinghouse plasma is scaled to the world’s largest gasifiers at Teesside and fails; Air Products writes down ~$1 billion and exits.
2010s–20sBiomass gasification matures (Andritz, Valmet) while smaller waste-gasification ventures stall — Enerkem retired and insolvent by 2025, EQTEC restructured in 2026.

§ The lesson of forty years

The technologies that survived commercial scale share three traits: owned engineering (not re-badged third-party kit), operating references (not renderings), and feed tolerance — the ability to take the variable, contaminated waste industry actually produces. The ones that didn’t survive almost universally failed on the second: they were sold on a drawing before they had run a plant. No ranking can predict the next failure; a credible one can at least tell you which companies have already cleared the bar.

Writing a market study or investment case?

We provide the cited, up-to-date landscape — who owns what, who operates where, and who is still standing — so your case rests on evidence, not a vendor deck.

Request the landscape